Ex-FBI Chiefs Face Perjury Counts Over 2023 Laptop Testimony
Prosecutors accuse two former bureau executives of concealing their roles in the Hunter Biden investigation while testifying before the House Judiciary Committee.
By Joseph Jenkins ·

Two former FBI executives are under federal charges for allegedly lying to Congress about their involvement in the bureau's investigation of Hunter Biden's laptop. The Justice Department announced the indictment on Friday against Nikki Floris, a former intelligence division analyst, and Bradley Benavides, a former deputy assistant director for counterintelligence. Prosecutors claim both men intentionally withheld information during 2023 testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. If convicted, each defendant faces a maximum prison sentence of five years.
US Attorney Jeanine Pirro, who is leading the prosecution, stated that the pair undermined the institutions they served. She described their actions as a strike against the democratic system, asserting that senior agents who believe they are above the law must face consequences. "It's time to bring the hammer of justice down on them," Pirro said.
An FBI affidavit details the specific omissions attributed to Floris. The document states she repeatedly denied involvement in the Hunter Biden probes while testifying. In reality, the affidavit claims she maintained frequent communication with the case team for over a year, exchanging information about the target. It further alleges she testified that she knew nothing about the laptop, despite coordinating the FBI's real-time response to news coverage regarding the device.
Benavides testified before the same committee months after Floris. He told lawmakers he knew little about the matter and claimed he learned about the laptop from a Wikipedia entry while preparing his statements. The affidavit contradicts this by stating he was in constant communication about the laptop for several days. A committee member said these answers shaped the investigation, specifically by halting follow-up interviews and subpoenas.
Defense attorneys for Floris rejected the allegations, arguing the Department of Justice relied on political claims rather than facts. They characterized Floris as a patriot who served as an FBI intelligence officer for nearly 20 years. Her lawyers noted the timing of the charges, calling them nonsense filed years later on the eve of an election. Ron Safer, attorney for Benavides, asked the court to hold a hearing to determine if prosecutors had sufficient evidence against what he called two lifetime public servants.
US Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui questioned the timing of the prosecution, noting that the charges came more than three years after the original testimony. He granted the defense's request for an evidentiary hearing to weigh the government's proof. The hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, a timeframe Faruqui described as rare for defendants who have been released from custody. "It's certainly rare," he said, "But it is more rare that we have charges that are this old of this nature."
Faruqui observed that both defendants had strong backgrounds in law enforcement and a clear interest in clearing their names quickly. He described the charges as a Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads, noting the matter would follow them for the rest of their lives.
The laptop at the center of the case has remained a partisan issue. Republicans argue it holds evidence of corruption in the Biden family, while Democrats view it as part of a Republican conspiracy. The device was handed to the FBI in 2019 after a computer shop owner stated that Hunter Biden had dropped it off and never returned to collect it. The owner told the Washington Post he turned it over to authorities after viewing some of its contents.
The indictment arrives as many FBI agents accused by allies of President Donald Trump of working against him have been pushed out of the bureau since the start of his second term. Some of those agents say they were dismissed for working on investigations involving Trump, while others claim they were fired for not showing enough loyalty.
Source: The Jerusalem Post





